Age Verification

This website requires you to be 16 or over, Please confirm you are over 16

I Am Over 16 Leave Website
Informations
Jump to content

Lorem Ipsum...

Click to Dismiss this Notification
Ładowanie danych...

  • Articles

    Show all categories
    Records

    SEC on the Warpath! Another Firm Receives Subpoena Notice

    The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has struck again in the cryptocurrency space. The agency, led by Gary Gensler, has recently been sending subpoenas to firms in the industry, warning them of impending lawsuits. Clearly, the regulator views all altcoins as unregistered securities. This time, the regulatory body's attention has fallen on Robinhood.
    Robinhood Expects Lawsuit from SEC
    Following Uniswap's decentralized exchange and Consensys, the creators of MetaMask, who received subpoenas from the SEC last month, Robinhood has also received a subpoena notice. The firm, known for its financial services and brokerage platform, allows users to trade stocks, ETFs, and certain cryptocurrencies.
    On May 4, the company received a Wells notice from the US regulatory body, which is essentially a warning that the SEC is preparing to sue it. This is not surprising, given that Robinhood removed certain altcoins from its trading platform last year after they were listed as securities in lawsuits against exchanges Binance and Coinbase. At that time, Robinhood delisted tokens such as Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), and Polygon (MATIC).
    It is therefore no surprise that the company's leadership is expressing disappointment with the SEC's decision. "After years of trying to cooperate with the SEC in good faith to ensure transparency in regulations, including our well-known attempt to 'enter and register,' we are disappointed that the agency has decided to issue a Wells notice in connection with our cryptocurrency activities in the US," said Dan Gallagher, General Counsel at Robinhood.
    The company's CEO, Vlad Tenev, has also issued a statement, saying that if necessary, the firm will seek legal recourse to resolve this issue.
    0 comments
    1.2k views
    Read more...
    Records

    SEC Delays Decision on Invesco Galaxy's ETF Spot Ether Request

    The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed its decision on Invesco Galaxy's request for an ETF spot ether. The agency has given itself an additional 60 days to review the documents, with the next deadline set for July 5.
    The SEC believes that it needs more time to consider the proposed changes and address the issues raised in the document. This is not the first time the agency has delayed its decision on Ethereum ETFs. In recent months, the SEC has delayed its decision on requests from all eight potential issuers of ETH ETFs, including BlackRock, Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, Hashdex, and Ark 21Shares.
    No one is surprised by this move, as it is a standard procedure.
    The key date is May 23, as it is the final deadline for the SEC to make a decision on VanEck's request. If the SEC decides to approve all bitcoin funds, it must say "yes" by May 23.
    In March, Bloomberg's senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas stated that the chances of creating ETFs for ether had decreased from 50% to 35%. Other experts share this view and point out that there is no news about talks between the SEC and issuers.
    Could an ETH ETF not be created?
    This would be surprising, as one of the applicants is BlackRock, a massive investment giant with a nearly 100% success rate in getting ETF approvals. There are already ETFs for futures ether and spot bitcoin. So, what argument would regulators need to reject applications for stock market funds? It seems that the only way to justify this would be to recognize ETH as a security.
    0 comments
    1.2k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Joe Biden wants to veto an important resolution for the cryptocurrency market

    The US House of Representatives has prepared a pro-cryptocurrency bill. However, Joe Biden has already announced that he will veto it.
    Does Joe Biden Not Want to Help the Market?
    President Joe Biden has announced that he will veto the congressional bill. Congressmen want to stop banks from being subject to a controversial accounting policy prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
    What's the issue? It's that in the US, banks can store cryptocurrencies for clients. The problem is that they must display these digital assets in their financial statements, which increases the costs of the entire process. This is the SEC's idea.
    "Gary Gensler, in his jihad against digital assets, has used supposedly humble guidelines for personnel to basically prevent large banks listed on the stock exchange from taking care of digital assets," said Republican Mike Flood (from Nebraska) during the hearings.
    "If you want Americans to be able to safely use digital assets, banks - which are one of the most heavily regulated companies in our country - are probably the best place [to store them]," explained congressman Patrick McHenry.
    Biden's Veto
    It turns out that the bill has received support not only from Republicans but also from Democrats. However, the White House has already announced that Joe Biden will veto the bill.
    The President claims that the SEC's policy is correct because it is an action "in favor of protecting investors in the cryptocurrency market."
    "Limiting SEC's ability to maintain complex and effective regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies would cause significant financial instability and market uncertainty," said the White House.
    All this fits into what Donald Trump is doing, who is once again competing with Biden for the presidency. When asked about his perspective on keeping cryptocurrency companies in the United States during a meeting with his supporters, he confirmed that as President, he will fight for better regulations for them. He pointed out that the current administration (he mentioned Gary Gensler's name) is hostile towards Bitcoin.
    Additionally, politicians from the Republican Party are more often pro-cryptocurrency than their Democratic counterparts. Trump is likely fighting for this electorate. Moreover, his recent main rival in the race for the White House, Ron DeSantis, was also fighting for this group of voters. The same is true for Robert F. Kennedy, an independent candidate.
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Sam Bankman-Fried Still Investing. But You Won't Believe What He's Buying

    The co-founder of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, is currently serving his time in prison. He has over 20 years left to serve. Despite his confinement, he gave an interview to the media and revealed what he's investing in.
    Sam Bankman-Fried's Life in Prison
    Sam Bankman-Fried is currently living in the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) on Brooklyn. In August 2023, he spoke with William Cohan of Puck News. The interview was published on May 9th.
    During the interview, the former CEO talked about his life in prison. He mentioned that he receives vegan meals, eating beans and rice. Interestingly, he revealed that he invests in rice. Yes, you read that right - rice has become one of the currencies in MDC.
    At one point, he even joked that rice gives him enormous arbitrage opportunities, even bigger than those in cryptocurrencies.
    Cohan added that Bankman-Fried was "considerably slimmer" than before, having lost 25 pounds (11 kilograms) and was "less puffy, less manic, less restless". During the interview, he looked straight into Cohan's eyes and seemed almost calm. He even admitted that he had developed the skill of pretending to be fine, saying that he was coping well.
    Apparently, life in prison is boring (which is hard to believe). The former businessman had access to TV and a tablet, but not connected to the internet. He spent his time playing games on the tablet.
    He also admitted that he doesn't worry about his safety but doesn't sleep well because other inmates often wake him up. Why? Well, it's all about his rice trading again. Apparently, other inmates frequently wake him up to ask about his rice packets, which they want to use for trading. A Martyr?
    The former head of FTX told Cohan that he feels like a martyr. He doesn't feel guilty and believes that his only mistake was neglecting certain procedures.
    Cohan noted in his piece that Bankman-Fried still doesn't believe he committed any crime. We don't know if his ultimate sentence, which he received a few months later, changed this state of affairs.
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Binance Rejects Allegations of Market Manipulation by DWF Labs

    DWF Labs has once again been accused of market manipulation, with reports suggesting that the company manipulated the price of several cryptocurrencies, including Yield Guild Game (YGG), in 2023. However, Binance has vehemently denied the allegations, stating that its market surveillance program would not allow such manipulation.
    According to a recent report by The Wall Street Journal, DWF Labs allegedly manipulated the price of YGG and at least six other cryptocurrencies last year. However, Binance has insisted that its robust market surveillance framework would prevent such manipulation from occurring.
    "We emphatically reject any assertion that our market surveillance program has permitted market manipulation on our platform," said a Binance spokesperson. "We have a robust market surveillance framework that identifies and takes action against unfair trading practices. Any users who breach our terms of use are immediately removed; we do not tolerate unfair trading practices."
    Binance has also highlighted its efforts to prevent and detect market manipulation, pointing to its ban on over 355,000 users who have violated its terms of use. The company has also emphasized the importance of investigating potential market manipulation, which is a top priority for the world's largest exchange.
    "Independent investigations have also validated the effectiveness of our approach, finding 'minimal signs of anomalous trading activities'," said the Binance spokesperson.
    The allegations against DWF Labs are not new, with the company being accused of market manipulation earlier in the year. Wintermute, an algorithmic trading firm and market maker, was one of the first companies to accuse DWF Labs of crypto market manipulation.
    DWF Labs has strongly denied the allegations, with its co-founder Andrei Grachev calling the claims "baseless". The company has also emphasized its commitment to fair and transparent trading practices.
    The allegations against DWF Labs highlight the ongoing challenges faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in detecting and preventing market manipulation. As the industry continues to evolve, it is crucial that exchanges prioritize transparency and fairness in their trading practices.
    Related: Public blockchain ledgers 'not fit for purpose', says JPMorgan executive
    DWF Labs — a Web3 investment and market-making firm — was first hit by market manipulation allegations in September 2023 after high-volume on-chain activity raised concerns among crypto investors.
    Wintermute, an algorithmic trading firm and market maker, was among the first companies to accuse DWF Labs of crypto market manipulation.
    During a September interview at Token2049, Wintermute co-founder Yoann Turpin said that DWF Labs "are not market makers in our sense" and confuse users because they "declare what are essentially [over-the-counter] trades as investments."
    Andrei Grachev, the co-founder of DWF Labs, has strongly denied the allegations.
    Related: Trader loses 7-figure sum due to 0L Network hard fork
    0 comments
    1.2k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Cybercriminals Stole Nearly $47 Million In Cryptocurrencies In February

    Company Scam Sniffer, specializing in protection against fraud in the world of Web3, has released data on the amount scammers seized last month as a result of scams and phishing, among other things. It turns out that there was a loss of $46.86 million in crypto during the last month. Cryptocurrency scammers still active.
    Data from the analysis conducted by the company indicates that over 57,000 people fell victim to various types of phishing in February. Interestingly, compared to the previous month, the number of people who lost over a million dollars decreased by 75%. However, on February 15, exceptionally large losses were recorded, exceeding $6.2 million in digital assets - all in one day.
    Users of Ethereum were particularly affected. The thefts on the main Ethereum chain resulted in losses of over $36.2 million, accounting for 78% of all fraud from the previous month. Ethereum-based tokens, especially ERC tokens, accounted for 86% of the total amount of fraudulently obtained funds. This amounted to $40 million.
    According to a report by Immunefi, most individual attacks took place on the Ethereum platform, where 12 incidents were reported, responsible for 85.71% of the total losses on the attacked networks.
    Not only investors were victims
    In February, there were also several high-profile thefts. The gaming platform Web3, PlayDapp, reported a serious security breach on February 10, resulting in losses exceeding $290 million.
    On the decentralized exchange FixedFloat, there was a theft of 409 bitcoins and 1700 ETH, adding up to a loss of around $26.2 million. FixedFloat stated that the attack was not caused by internal errors but by deficiencies in the exchange's infrastructure.
     
     
     
     
     
    0 comments
    1.2k views
    Read more...
    Records

    LockBit taken over by the authorities

    Please Register !

    An international law enforcement operation conducted on Monday seized servers and disrupted the infrastructure utilized by the LockBit ransomware syndicate, marking the latest effort to hinder the technical apparatus of criminal and espionage factions.
    Dubbed "Operation Cronos," the endeavor, orchestrated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the U.K.'s National Crime Agency in collaboration with various global partners, targeted a site utilized by LockBit for data leakage, the group's file-sharing service and communication server, as well as several affiliate and support servers. Additionally, a server hosting LockBit's administrative panel was seized, as revealed by a senior FBI official to CyberScoop.
    As a significant facet of the operation, the FBI gained access to nearly 1,000 decryption keys, potentially enabling the retrieval or mitigation of ongoing LockBit extortion activities.
    "This operation exemplifies the distinctive and substantial mission the FBI holds to impose repercussions on highly sophisticated cyber actors while simultaneously prioritizing assistance to cyberattack victims," expressed Brett Leatherman, the FBI's Deputy Assistant Director of Cyber Operations, during an interview.
    A representative of LockBit acknowledged the operation through an online post on VX-Underground by stating, "FBI pwned me."
    Graeme Biggar, Director General of the National Crime Agency, declared, "As of today, LockBit are locked out. We have significantly impaired the capabilities and notably the credibility of a group reliant on secrecy and anonymity."
    Europol reported that two individuals were apprehended during the operation — one in Poland and the other in Ukraine.
    This takedown marks the latest in a series of FBI operations aimed at disrupting cybercrime and cyberespionage infrastructure worldwide under Rule 41, a legal framework granting the FBI access to computers across multiple jurisdictions for modification. Recently, the agency announced the dismantling of a botnet controlled by Russian military intelligence. In January, the FBI dismantled a Chinese botnet used to infiltrate sensitive U.S. targets.
    Emerging in September 2019, LockBit is believed to be the most widely employed ransomware variant globally. Leatherman revealed that it has been utilized by over 100 affiliates worldwide, resulting in over $144 million in ransom payments. Approximately 2,000 businesses and entities worldwide, including at least 1,600 in the U.S., have been targeted. In 2023, it was the most prevalent ransomware variant targeting industrial facilities, accounting for a quarter of all such incidents tracked by the cybersecurity firm Dragos.
    As part of Tuesday's operation, the U.S. government unsealed indictments against two Russian nationals allegedly involved in facilitating LockBit attacks: Artur Sungatov and Ivan Gennadievich Kondratyev, also known as "Bassterlord."
    Bassterlord, recognized within the cybercrime community, is alleged to have produced training materials for aspiring criminals and participated in multiple interviews. In an interview with the Click Here podcast, Bassterlord identified himself as "Ivan," claimed Ukrainian nationality, and asserted retirement from criminal endeavors.
    Leatherman described the two individuals as "original affiliates, dating back to at least LockBit 1.0."
    Ransomware groups like LockBit typically operate on an affiliate model, wherein a central entity controls the infrastructure, leases access to it, and shares profits from operations conducted by "affiliates" using that infrastructure.
    Sungatov and Kondratyev remain at large, and alongside Tuesday's indictment, the U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions against them. The U.S. State Department is poised to announce rewards of up to $10 million for information leading to the identification or location of LockBit leaders and $5 million for information on individuals involved in LockBit ransomware activities.
    Earlier this month, similar rewards were offered by the State Department for information related to the ALPHV/BlackCat and Hive ransomware operations.
    The operation against LockBit prompts inquiries into its lasting impact. Previous operations against such groups have resulted in temporary disruptions, only for the groups to resurface using new infrastructure. In December, the FBI seized some of ALPHV's infrastructure, but the group managed to regain control, and a version of the site remains active.
    Leatherman refrained from divulging specifics of the LockBit operation but stated that the actions "disrupted the infrastructure behind LockBit in a completely different manner than BlackCat." While it's conceivable for a variant to "reconstitute," Leatherman asserted that LockBit would be unable to regain control of the servers utilized by the actors.
    Both investigations remain ongoing, with entities believing themselves to be victims of LockBit encouraged to visit a new landing page established by the FBI.
    The unsealed indictments on Tuesday mark the fourth and fifth cases brought against accused LockBit affiliates since 2022. Mikhail Vasiliev, a dual Russian and Canadian citizen, was apprehended in Canada in November 2022. He pleaded guilty in Canada on February 8 to cyber extortion and weapons charges, awaiting extradition to the United States.
    Ruslan Magomedovich Astamirov, a Russian national, was arrested in Arizona in June 2023 for his alleged involvement in LockBit attacks.
    Mikhail Pavlovich Matveev, another Russian national known as Wazawaka, was indicted in May 2023 for his role in ransomware attacks, including LockBit, Babuk, and Hive ransomware variants. The State Department offers a reward of up to $10 million for information leading to his arrest.
     
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    FIFA Will Create An NFT Collection. And It's All About The World Cup

    The International Federation of Association Football (FIFA), the organization that manages international football tournaments, has collaborated with Modex, a blockchain company, to release its own collection of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). This is just in time for the Club World Cup, in which the top football clubs compete, and the launch will take place on December 15th.
    The collection will consist of several hundred NFTs, and according to the company's blog, 100 digital collector's items will be available on FIFA Collect+ first, including some of the rarest items that will enable fans to obtain tickets to the FIFA World Cup final.
    An additional 900 collector's digital items will be issued on the Polygon network and made available on the OpenSea platform, and their launch is planned for December 19th, when the Club World Cup FIFA is nearing its climax. It will feature memorable moments from the tournament, as well as digital versions of souvenirs.
    The limited NFTs will serve as an additional ticket to the FIFA World Cup, which is an interesting idea. In addition to this, there will be standard limited edition tokens (900 pieces).
    "Collector's digital items enhance the way fans can interact with their favorite players, teams, and the game they love, and we are honored to support FIFA in achieving this goal," said Francesco Abbate, CEO of Modex.
    FIFA+ Collect and 11 NFT airdrops
    From its inception, the FIFA+ Collect platform enabled the organization to hold 11 NFT airdrops. As a result, 909,255 digital collector's items have appeared on the market, with 16,448 buyers. All of this has translated into high trading volumes, with a volume of $2.4 million USD on the primary and secondary NFT markets.
    In conclusion, FIFA has introduced an exciting collection of NFTs that will attract fans to football culture while simultaneously providing additional, unique experiences to participants.
     
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Mickey Mouse Is No Longer Owned By Disney. NFT Issuers Are Taking Advantage Of This

    The early version of Mickey Mouse is no longer under Disney's legal ownership. As a result, it has been transferred to the blockchain in the form of an NFT.
    On January 1st, the version of the world's most famous mouse featured in the 1928 short film "Steamboat Willie" became publicly available. This is due to the expiration of copyright laws, which in the United States allow for copyright to be owned for only 95 years. Mickey Mouse (at least in its original form) is now free!
    This expiration of copyright presents an opportunity for NFT issuers. Three NFT collections related to Mickey have appeared on the market and currently occupy the top three spots on OpenSea's 24-hour trending list. The "Steamboat Willie Public Domain 2024" NFT collection took first place after achieving a volume of trading worth approximately $1.2 million USD. The second place belongs to the series titled "Steamboat Willie," and third place belongs to "Steamboat Willie's Riverboat."
    The "Steamboat Willie Public Domain 2024" collection also landed in sixth place on OpenSea's 24-hour bestsellers list, joining the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) and Pudgy Penguins. The "Steamboat Willie" series landed in eighth place on the same list.
    However, it's worth noting that Disney is not completely giving up. In a statement prepared for CNN, a spokesperson for the entertainment giant stated that the company plans to "continue to protect" its rights to Mickey Mouse, but only to its modern versions. "We'll work to protect consumers from confusion caused by unauthorized use of Mickey and our other iconic characters," they added.
    In fact, it's important to emphasize that the company only lacks rights to the early version of the cartoon mouse. This does not apply to later incarnations. Use without Disney's permission, for example, of versions from the 90s, is still illegal. It's worth keeping in mind as NFTs related to modern Mickey could also appear on the market.
     
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Spot ETF For Bit Coin Accepted !

    SEC Approves Bitcoin Spot ETF

    The American Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finally approved the first application to list Ark 21Shares Bitcoin ETF. The fund is expected to start trading on Thursday, January 11, 2024.

    The news of the SEC giving the green light for the first spot Bitcoin ETF has contributed to a slight increase in the price of the cryptocurrency. Bitcoin briefly reached $47,750 at one point in the past night. However, by Thursday morning, its price had dropped to just over $26,000.

    Despite this, Bitcoin is still over $30,000 more expensive than it was in November 2022, when it was priced at below $15,500.

    Bitcoin is predicted to increase by 980% to $500,000

    It seems that the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs will support the long-term influx of institutional capital into the virtual asset market, seen as a bullish signal for Bitcoin overall. Thomas Lee, a managing partner of Fundstrat Global Advisors, also believes that Bitcoin could rise to $150,000 within the next 12 months and potentially reach $500,000 within the next five years.

    Considering that one Bitcoin currently costs $46,000, this would represent a 224% increase in a year and a 980% increase over a five-year period.

    Bitcoin to Surge by 980% to $500,000! These Two Factors will Drive the Bull Market

    Bitcoin enthusiasts have been making similar predictions for some time now. Their analyses are based on a basic model of supply and demand. If Bitcoin becomes mainstream and represents just 10% of the global market capitalization, with only 21 million BTC in existence, its value could indeed reach millions.

    Bitcoin Spot ETF to Attract Institutional Capital

    Lee's optimistic forecast is based on several key events in the Bitcoin market. The primary factor is the increasing involvement of institutional investors, which has been a bullish signal for Bitcoin over the past year. When BlackRock, the world's largest investment fund, submitted the first application for a Bitcoin ETF to the SEC, it was seen as a major endorsement.

    Lee believes that institutional adoption will legitimize Bitcoin and attract large investments, thereby increasing demand and ultimately its price.

    Lee also stated that the approval of a Bitcoin ETF could unlock a new wave of demand. The introduction of ETF funds will provide a streamlined and regulated path for a wider range of investors, especially those from traditional financial markets, seeking exposure to BTC.

    4th Bitcoin Halving is Coming

    Another factor driving bullish sentiment in 2024 is the upcoming Bitcoin halving event, expected in about 12 weeks. This event will reduce the mining reward for new blocks to 3,125 BTC from the current 6,25 BTC.

    The halving will effectively slow down the rate at which new BTC is generated.

    A halving in new supply, along with constant or increasing demand, should lead to price increases. This trend has been seen after each halving event in Bitcoin's history, with significant value spikes each time. Following halvings, Bitcoin saw increases of:

    9594% in 2013-2014
    3012% in 2016-2017
    652% in 2020-2021

    While each subsequent halving saw smaller percentage increases, the fact remains that these increases occurred without the involvement of large financial institutions.

    This belief is shared by Bitcoin supporters who predict that in the coming year, Bitcoin will reach new all-time highs after the halving.

    Lee's predictions also echo the sentiments expressed by other financial experts and cryptocurrency enthusiasts, such as Anthony Scaramucci, Arthur Hayes, and Samson Mow, who have also forecasted similar value increases for Bitcoin due to limited supply and increased institutional investments.
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    The XRP cryptocurrency experiences a substantial surge in value following a major legal triumph for Ripple in its legal battle against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

    Ripple's XRP cryptocurrency experienced a significant surge in value on Thursday following a ruling by a judge in the Southern District of New York stating that it may not be classified as a security by default.
    According to Coin Metrics, the price of XRP increased by 71% to around 80 cents per coin. This news brought optimism to cryptocurrency investors, as it suggested that other alternative coins (altcoins) may also not be considered securities. As a result, Polygon's Matic token saw a gain of 17.82%, while Litecoin and Solana experienced a jump of 18.35% and Cardano's token advanced by 20.31%. Bitcoin and Ether also received a boost, with their values rising by over 4% and 6% respectively.
    Chris Martin, Head of Research at Amberdata, expressed his enthusiasm for the industry, stating, "The judgments today are a huge step forward for the industry. By ruling that XRP is not a security, we are gaining clarity on the distinction between securities and commodities. This will require the SEC to reconsider their approach in several ongoing cases, and I anticipate that this ruling will also impact the classification of other tokens as non-securities."
    Coinbase, which had previously delisted XRP from its trading platform, announced on Twitter that it would once again allow trading of the asset. Gemini also stated that it is exploring the possibility of listing XRP for both spot and derivatives trading.
    Martin further emphasized the implications of the judgment on institutional sales of XRP by Ripple, stating, "This ruling also has significant implications for the industry, potentially putting several initial coin offerings (ICOs) in the spotlight. As for exchanges involved in ongoing SEC cases, it remains unclear how this ruling will affect them, as they have mostly been engaged in secondary sales. Nevertheless, as we can see from today's market prices, there is a strong bullish sentiment following these judgments."
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    SEC Lawsuit Against Coinbase: A Crucial Test for the Crypto Industry's Regulatory

    Introduction:
    Coinbase, one of the leading cryptocurrency exchanges globally, is currently facing a significant legal challenge in the form of a lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This lawsuit carries significant implications not only for Coinbase but also for the wider cryptocurrency industry. This article aims to delve into the details of the case and explore the potential ramifications for both Coinbase and the evolving regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies.
    Background:
    Founded in 2012, Coinbase has emerged as a prominent player in the cryptocurrency market, offering a user-friendly platform for buying, selling, and storing digital assets. With millions of users and billions of dollars in trading volume, Coinbase has played a pivotal role in facilitating the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies. However, as the industry continues to evolve, regulatory scrutiny has intensified, leading to the SEC's lawsuit against Coinbase.
    The SEC Allegations:
    The SEC accuses Coinbase of engaging in unregistered securities offerings and operating a lending program, which the regulatory agency considers to be securities. The lawsuit claims that Coinbase's lending product, known as "Lend," violates securities laws by offering interest-bearing accounts without registering them as securities with the SEC. The SEC argues that these actions by Coinbase constitute an unlawful sale of securities and undermine investor protection measures.
    Potential Implications:
        Regulatory Clarity: The lawsuit against Coinbase underscores the need for greater regulatory clarity in the cryptocurrency space. The outcome of this case could potentially set a precedent for how cryptocurrencies and related services are regulated in the future. It may prompt regulators to establish clear guidelines on offerings, lending programs, and other crypto-related activities, providing greater certainty for market participants.
        Investor Protection: The SEC's legal action against Coinbase seeks to protect investors from potential risks associated with unregistered securities offerings. By enforcing regulations, the SEC aims to ensure that investors receive adequate information and protection when engaging with digital assets. The outcome of this case could influence how investors perceive the safety and credibility of the cryptocurrency market.
        Market Volatility: The ongoing lawsuit introduces an element of uncertainty that could contribute to increased market volatility. News of regulatory action against a prominent exchange like Coinbase may cause short-term fluctuations in cryptocurrency prices. However, if the outcome of the case clarifies the regulatory framework, it could potentially lead to increased stability and investor confidence in the long run.
        Industry Adaptation: The SEC's legal challenge serves as a reminder that the cryptocurrency industry must adapt to evolving regulatory requirements. Exchanges like Coinbase may need to revise their business models and operations to ensure compliance with securities laws. This could lead to enhanced transparency, due diligence, and investor protection measures across the industry.
    Conclusion:
    The SEC lawsuit against Coinbase represents a crucial moment for the cryptocurrency industry's regulatory framework. The outcome will undoubtedly shape the future of cryptocurrency exchanges and their compliance obligations. As regulators aim to strike a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding investors, it is essential to establish clear guidelines that promote the responsible growth of the crypto market. The resolution of this case will provide insights into how regulators and industry participants can work together to build a more robust and trusted ecosystem for digital assets.
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Binance Facing Legal Action by SEC: Implications for the Crypto Market

    Introduction:
    In recent news, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Binance, one of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges. The legal action taken by the SEC carries significant implications for both Binance and the broader crypto market. This article aims to shed light on the details of the case and explore the potential consequences for the exchange and the cryptocurrency industry as a whole.
    Background:
    Binance, founded in 2017, quickly rose to prominence as a global leader in the cryptocurrency exchange space. With its wide array of trading options and extensive coin offerings, the platform has attracted millions of users worldwide. However, its rapid growth and expanding services have also drawn increased regulatory scrutiny.
    The SEC Lawsuit:
    The SEC alleges that Binance has violated securities laws by offering and selling digital asset securities to U.S. investors without proper registration. The complaint suggests that Binance allowed users to trade securities that qualify as securities under U.S. law, yet failed to meet the necessary regulatory requirements. The SEC claims that Binance's actions have caused substantial harm to U.S. investors, thereby necessitating legal action to protect their interests.
    Potential Consequences:
        Regulatory Impact: The SEC's lawsuit against Binance sends a strong message to other cryptocurrency exchanges operating in the U.S. market. It highlights the regulatory agency's intent to enforce securities laws in the crypto sphere. As a result, exchanges may face increased scrutiny and stricter compliance requirements.
        Investor Confidence: The legal action raises concerns about the level of investor protection within the crypto market. While regulatory oversight is crucial for safeguarding investors, the lawsuit against Binance could dent confidence in the industry as a whole. Investors may become more cautious, potentially affecting trading volumes and market sentiment.
        Market Volatility: Binance's legal battle with the SEC has the potential to introduce increased volatility into the crypto market. Uncertainty surrounding the outcome of the lawsuit and its implications for Binance's operations could result in short-term price fluctuations and heightened market turbulence.
        Industry Regulation: The lawsuit highlights the need for clearer regulations surrounding cryptocurrencies and exchanges. It may prompt policymakers to expedite the development of comprehensive regulatory frameworks to address the challenges posed by digital assets. Such regulations could provide greater clarity for market participants, potentially fostering long-term stability and investor confidence.
    Conclusion:
    Binance's legal battle with the SEC marks a significant development in the regulation of the cryptocurrency industry. The outcome of the lawsuit will likely have far-reaching implications for Binance and other exchanges, as well as the broader crypto market. As regulators worldwide grapple with the evolving nature of digital assets, it is crucial to strike a balance between investor protection and fostering innovation. The outcome of this case will serve as a pivotal moment in shaping the future of the cryptocurrency landscape.
    0 comments
    1.4k views
    Read more...
    Records

    BitTorrent Seedbox Criminal Conviction

    BitTorrent seedboxes have long been a popular tool for users looking to download and share large files quickly and easily. However, the use of these seedboxes for piracy has long been a contentious issue, with many seedbox providers facing legal challenges over the years. In a recent case, a BitTorrent seedbox provider was handed a criminal conviction over users' piracy, highlighting the challenges facing seedbox providers and the need for greater accountability in the industry.
    The case involved a French seedbox provider, which was found guilty of "complicity in the infringement of copyright" by a French court. The court ruled that the provider had knowingly provided a service that enabled users to share copyrighted material, including movies, TV shows, and music, without permission from the copyright holders.
    The seedbox provider was ordered to pay a fine of €3,000 and was also ordered to cease all activities related to the provision of seedboxes for a period of six months. The ruling was seen as a significant victory for copyright holders, who have long struggled to hold seedbox providers accountable for the actions of their users.
    Seedboxes work by allowing users to download and upload files using the BitTorrent protocol. The files are stored on a remote server, rather than the user's own computer, which allows for faster download speeds and greater privacy. However, the use of seedboxes for piracy has been a long-standing issue, with many providers turning a blind eye to the activities of their users.
    The conviction of the French seedbox provider highlights the need for greater accountability in the seedbox industry. While many providers have policies in place to prevent piracy, these policies are often difficult to enforce, and some providers may turn a blind eye to the activities of their users in order to maintain their customer base.
    The conviction also raises questions about the legality of seedboxes as a whole. While seedboxes are not inherently illegal, their use for piracy is a clear violation of copyright law. As such, providers must take greater responsibility for the actions of their users and work to prevent piracy on their platforms.
    However, the conviction of the French seedbox provider also raises concerns about the potential for overzealous enforcement of copyright law. While piracy is certainly a serious issue, it is important that the rights of seedbox providers and their users are also respected. The conviction of a seedbox provider for the actions of its users could set a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to greater censorship and regulation of the internet.
    In conclusion, the conviction of a French seedbox provider over users' piracy highlights the challenges facing seedbox providers and the need for greater accountability in the industry. While seedboxes are a valuable tool for many users, they must be used responsibly and in accordance with copyright law. Providers must take greater responsibility for the actions of their users and work to prevent piracy on their platforms, while also ensuring that the rights of their users are respected. As the internet continues to evolve, it is important that we find a balance between protecting intellectual property rights and preserving the open and free nature of the internet.
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Zippyshare Will Be Close After 17 Years

    Zippyshare was a popular file hosting service that gained immense popularity for its fast and easy-to-use platform. However, the website was shut down in 2020 due to legal issues, leaving many users stranded without access to their files. In this article, we will take a deep dive into the closed Zippyshare project, exploring the reasons behind its shutdown, and the impact it has had on its users.
    Zippyshare was launched in 2006 and quickly became one of the most popular file hosting services on the internet. The platform was free to use, and users could upload and share files with ease. Zippyshare's popularity was fueled by its fast download speeds, which made it a favorite among users who needed to share large files quickly.
    However, despite its popularity, Zippyshare faced numerous legal challenges over the years. The platform was frequently used to share copyrighted material, including movies, music, and software. This led to legal action against the website, with several record labels and movie studios filing lawsuits against Zippyshare for copyright infringement.
    In response to these legal challenges, Zippyshare implemented various measures to prevent the sharing of copyrighted material. However, these measures were not enough to satisfy the copyright holders, and in 2020, the website was shut down.
    The shutdown of Zippyshare has had a significant impact on its users. Many users relied on the platform to share files with friends, family, and colleagues, and the sudden closure of the website left them without access to their files. Some users lost important documents, photos, and other files, which they had stored on the platform.
    The shutdown of Zippyshare has also had an impact on the wider file hosting industry. The closure of such a popular and well-established platform has raised concerns among users about the stability and longevity of other file hosting services. Many users have turned to alternative platforms, such as Google Drive and Dropbox, but these platforms have their own limitations, such as storage limits and slower download speeds.
    In conclusion, the closure of Zippyshare was a significant blow to the file hosting industry and its users. While the platform faced numerous legal challenges over the years, its sudden shutdown has left many users stranded without access to their files. The closure of Zippyshare highlights the challenges facing file hosting services, particularly those that allow the sharing of copyrighted material. As users continue to rely on these platforms for sharing and storing files, it is essential that they are properly regulated to prevent copyright infringement and ensure the long-term viability of the industry.
     
    Furthermore, the closure of Zippyshare has also highlighted the importance of backing up important files. Many users may have lost important documents, photos, and other files because they did not have a backup. It is crucial to regularly back up files to a secure location, such as an external hard drive or cloud storage platform, to ensure that they are not lost in the event of a platform shutdown or other unforeseen circumstances.
    Another lesson that can be learned from the closure of Zippyshare is the importance of respecting intellectual property rights. While it may be tempting to share copyrighted material, it is important to understand that doing so is illegal and can have serious consequences. By respecting intellectual property rights, we can help ensure that creative works are properly protected and that artists and creators are fairly compensated for their work.
    Overall, the closure of Zippyshare has had a significant impact on the file hosting industry and its users. While the platform may have had its flaws, it provided a valuable service to millions of users around the world. The lessons that can be learned from the closure of Zippyshare are many, including the importance of backing up important files, respecting intellectual property rights, and properly regulating file hosting services to prevent copyright infringement.
    As we move forward, it is essential that we continue to support and promote innovative and sustainable file hosting services that provide value to users while respecting the rights of artists and creators. The closure of Zippyshare has reminded us of the challenges facing the industry and the need for continued innovation and responsible practices to ensure its long-term viability.
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    A Few Words Regarding The Tor Project

    The Tor Project is an open-source project dedicated to providing online anonymity and privacy to users across the globe. The project's software, Tor, has been around for over two decades and is known for its strong security features.
    One of the main reasons why Tor is so secure is because it uses a technique called onion routing. Onion routing is a process by which a user's internet traffic is encrypted and then sent through multiple nodes (also known as relays) before reaching its final destination. Each node in the Tor network only knows the previous and next nodes in the chain, making it difficult for anyone to trace the traffic back to the user.
    However, the security of Tor extends beyond onion routing. Here are some of the ways in which Tor provides strong security:
    Encryption: Tor uses encryption to protect the privacy of user data as it travels through the network. When a user sends a message, Tor encrypts it multiple times, each time adding a layer of encryption (hence the term "onion routing"). This makes it incredibly difficult for anyone to intercept and decipher the message.
    Anonymous relays: The Tor network is made up of thousands of volunteer-operated relays located around the world. These relays are anonymous and do not know the identity of the user whose traffic they are forwarding. This anonymity makes it difficult for anyone to pinpoint the location or identity of the user.
    Hidden services: Tor also allows users to create hidden services, which are websites and services that can only be accessed through the Tor network. These services are hosted on anonymous servers and are often used by journalists, whistleblowers, and activists to share sensitive information without fear of retaliation.
    No logging: Tor does not keep logs of user activity, making it difficult for anyone to track a user's online behavior. This is important because many internet service providers and governments keep logs of user activity, which can be used to monitor and track users.
    Constant updates: The Tor Project is constantly updating the software to address security vulnerabilities and improve the user experience. The project has a large community of developers and volunteers who work tirelessly to ensure that Tor remains secure and up-to-date.
    Despite its strong security features, it is important to note that Tor is not foolproof. There have been instances where law enforcement agencies have been able to de-anonymize users on the Tor network. However, these instances are rare and typically require significant resources and expertise.
    In addition, Tor has been criticized for being used by criminals to carry out illegal activities. While it is true that some criminals have used Tor to carry out illicit activities, the vast majority of Tor users are law-abiding citizens who value their privacy and security.
    In conclusion, the Tor Project provides strong security features that make it a popular choice for users who value their privacy and anonymity. Its use of onion routing, anonymous relays, hidden services, and encryption make it incredibly difficult for anyone to intercept and decipher user traffic. While Tor is not foolproof, its strong security features and constant updates make it one of the most secure options available for online privacy and anonymity.
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Best Companies To Help Secure DDOS Attacks Recommended By Techrooms.eu

    Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks have become a major concern for businesses of all sizes. These attacks can cause significant damage to a company's reputation, revenue, and online presence. As such, it's important to have a reliable anti-DDoS solution in place. In this article, we'll discuss some of the best anti-DDoS companies hosting that can help protect your business from these attacks.
    Cloudflare Cloudflare is one of the most popular anti-DDoS companies hosting on the market. It offers a suite of security services that includes DDoS protection, web application firewall (WAF), and content delivery network (CDN) services. Cloudflare's DDoS protection service uses a network of data centers around the world to filter incoming traffic and identify and block malicious requests. This ensures that your website remains accessible to legitimate users while keeping attackers at bay.
    In addition to DDoS protection, Cloudflare's WAF can also help protect your website from other types of attacks, including SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and more. The CDN service, on the other hand, helps improve website performance by caching content and serving it from the data center that is closest to the user.
    Akamai Akamai is another well-known anti-DDoS company hosting that offers a range of security services. Its DDoS protection service uses a combination of network-based and application-layer defenses to protect against attacks of all sizes and types. Akamai's network is one of the largest in the world, with over 300,000 servers located in more than 130 countries.
    In addition to DDoS protection, Akamai also offers other security services such as WAF, bot management, and security analytics. Its WAF can help protect against common web application attacks such as SQL injection, XSS, and more, while its bot management service can help detect and block automated attacks.
    Incapsula Incapsula is a cloud-based security company that specializes in DDoS protection and WAF services. Its DDoS protection service uses a combination of machine learning algorithms and human expertise to detect and block attacks in real-time. The service can handle both volumetric and application-layer attacks, ensuring that your website remains online and accessible to legitimate users.
    Incapsula's WAF service can also help protect your website from other types of attacks such as XSS, SQL injection, and more. The company also offers a range of other security services such as bot protection, API security, and security analytics.
    Radware Radware is a cybersecurity company that offers a range of security solutions, including anti-DDoS services. Its DDoS protection service uses a combination of on-premise and cloud-based defenses to protect against attacks of all sizes and types. Radware's DDoS protection can also be integrated with its WAF and bot management services for a comprehensive security solution.
    Radware's WAF can help protect against common web application attacks such as XSS, SQL injection, and more, while its bot management service can help detect and block automated attacks. The company also offers a range of other security services such as SSL protection, DNS protection, and more.
    Fortinet Fortinet is a cybersecurity company that offers a range of security services, including anti-DDoS solutions. Its DDoS protection service uses a combination of network-based and application-layer defenses to protect against attacks of all sizes and types. Fortinet's DDoS protection can also be integrated with its WAF and bot management services for a comprehensive security solution.
    Fortinet's WAF can help protect against common web application attacks such as XSS, SQL injection, and more, while its bot management service can help detect and block automated attacks. The company also
    0 comments
    1.4k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Largest ddos attack in world history

    Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks have been a common method used by cybercriminals to disrupt online services by overwhelming servers with an enormous amount of traffic. These attacks have become increasingly sophisticated over time, resulting in the largest DDoS attacks that have been launched in recent years.
    In this article, we will take a look at the biggest DDoS attack in the world to date and examine the impact it had on the targeted website and the internet as a whole.
    The Attack
    The largest DDoS attack on record was launched against GitHub, a popular code hosting platform used by developers around the world, in February 2018. The attack peaked at 1.35 terabits per second (Tbps) and lasted for more than 20 minutes.
    The attack was initially detected by GitHub's automated systems, which alerted the company's security team. The team immediately began working to mitigate the attack, but it was so massive that it overwhelmed their defenses.
    The attackers used a technique called Memcached amplification, which involves exploiting misconfigured Memcached servers to amplify traffic and direct it towards the target. Memcached is a distributed memory caching system used to speed up websites and web applications. When misconfigured, it can be used to launch powerful DDoS attacks.
    The attackers were able to launch such a massive attack by using a botnet, which is a network of compromised computers that are controlled by a single entity. The botnet used in the attack was composed of tens of thousands of devices, including internet-connected cameras, routers, and other IoT devices.
    The Impact
    The GitHub DDoS attack was one of the largest and most powerful ever launched, and it had a significant impact on the internet as a whole. The attack caused disruptions for GitHub users around the world, as the website was inaccessible during the attack.
    The attack also caused widespread concern in the cybersecurity community, as it demonstrated the potential for massive DDoS attacks that could be used to take down critical internet infrastructure. The attack on GitHub highlighted the need for improved security measures and prompted many companies to review their own DDoS defenses.
    The Response
    GitHub responded to the attack by working with its infrastructure providers to identify and block the attack traffic. The company also worked to improve its DDoS defenses, implementing new measures to detect and mitigate DDoS attacks.
    The attack also prompted a broader response from the cybersecurity community, with many experts calling for increased collaboration and information sharing to combat the growing threat of DDoS attacks. The attack on GitHub highlighted the need for a more proactive approach to cybersecurity, with companies and individuals taking steps to protect themselves before an attack occurs.
    Conclusion
    The GitHub DDoS attack was the largest and most powerful ever launched, demonstrating the potential for cybercriminals to disrupt critical internet infrastructure using massive DDoS attacks. The attack had a significant impact on the internet and prompted a broad response from the cybersecurity community.
    While DDoS attacks are nothing new, the GitHub attack highlighted the need for improved security measures and a more proactive approach to cybersecurity. As technology continues to advance, it is likely that we will see more sophisticated and powerful DDoS attacks in the future. Companies and individuals must take steps to protect themselves and their infrastructure to mitigate the impact of these attacks.
    0 comments
    1.3k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Twitter Customer Database Hacked

    On the evening of July 14th, 2020, Twitter users around the world were shocked to learn that the company had experienced a major security breach. According to reports, hackers had managed to gain access to the company's internal systems and had stolen a large amount of data, including user information and confidential data about the company itself. In this article, we will explore what happened in the Twitter database theft, its impact, and what can be done to prevent similar incidents in the future.
    The first indication that something was amiss came in the form of a tweet from the official Twitter account of the company. The tweet stated that the company was aware of a "security incident" and was investigating the matter. In subsequent tweets, the company acknowledged that a number of high-profile accounts had been compromised and that the hackers had used the accounts to post scam messages, soliciting bitcoin donations.
    As the details of the breach began to emerge, it became clear that this was no ordinary hack. According to Twitter, the hackers had used a sophisticated attack that targeted a small number of employees with access to internal systems and tools. Once inside the system, the hackers were able to access a wide range of data, including usernames, email addresses, phone numbers, and more. In some cases, they were even able to access the direct messages of high-profile accounts.
    The impact of the Twitter database theft was far-reaching. Not only were individual users affected by the loss of their personal information, but the hack also had implications for the security of the platform as a whole. The fact that the hackers were able to gain access to internal systems raised questions about the effectiveness of Twitter's security protocols and the measures that the company had in place to protect user data.
    In response to the hack, Twitter took swift action to address the issue. The company temporarily disabled the ability to tweet from verified accounts and required all users to reset their passwords. In addition, the company launched an investigation into the incident and worked with law enforcement agencies to identify and apprehend the individuals responsible.
    So, what can be done to prevent similar incidents in the future? One key step is to ensure that internal systems and tools are properly secured. This includes ensuring that access to sensitive systems is limited to a small number of trusted employees and that those employees are regularly trained on security best practices. In addition, companies should consider implementing multi-factor authentication for all users, which requires users to provide more than one form of identification before gaining access to sensitive data or systems.
    Another important step is to regularly review and update security protocols. Companies should regularly test their security systems and procedures to ensure that they are effective in preventing and detecting breaches. This may involve conducting regular vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, and other security tests to identify and address potential weaknesses in the system.
    Finally, it is important to educate users about the importance of good security practices. This includes encouraging users to use strong, unique passwords for all accounts, to enable multi-factor authentication wherever possible, and to be wary of phishing emails and other types of scams. Companies can also provide users with resources and tools to help them better understand security risks and how to protect themselves online.
    In conclusion, the Twitter database theft was a wake-up call for companies around the world about the importance of good security practices. While no system is completely foolproof, there are steps that can be taken to minimize the risk of breaches and protect user data. By implementing strong security protocols, regularly reviewing and updating security systems, and educating users about good security practices, companies can help to prevent similar incidents in the future and protect the privacy and security of their users.
    0 comments
    1.5k views
    Read more...
    Records

    Activision Hacked In 2021

    In early 2021, Activision, one of the world's largest video game publishers, experienced a major hack that compromised the personal data of thousands of users. The attack was first reported by Vice's Motherboard, which obtained a copy of the ransom note left by the hackers. The note demanded a ransom payment of $4,000,000 in exchange for the stolen data, which included email addresses, passwords, and other sensitive information.
    The hack was carried out by a group of hackers who called themselves "The Suffering." According to Motherboard, the group gained access to Activision's systems by exploiting a vulnerability in the company's virtual private network (VPN). Once inside, the hackers were able to steal a large amount of data from Activision's servers, including information about the company's upcoming games and user data.
    The Suffering also claimed to have access to the source code for some of Activision's most popular games, including Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone. While Activision has not confirmed this claim, the company did acknowledge that the hack had occurred and that user data had been compromised.
    In response to the hack, Activision issued a statement saying that it takes the security of its systems and the privacy of its users "very seriously." The company also said that it had taken steps to address the vulnerability that was exploited in the attack and that it was working with law enforcement to investigate the incident.
    Activision also advised its users to change their passwords and enable two-factor authentication on their accounts as a precautionary measure. The company also said that it would provide additional updates on the situation as more information became available.
    The hack of Activision is just the latest in a string of high-profile cyber attacks that have affected companies and organizations around the world. These attacks have highlighted the growing importance of cybersecurity in today's digital age, and the need for companies to take proactive measures to protect their systems and data from potential threats.
    One of the biggest challenges facing companies like Activision is the sheer scale of their operations. With millions of users and a vast network of servers and systems, it can be difficult to identify and address potential vulnerabilities before they can be exploited by hackers.
    To address this challenge, many companies are turning to artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to help them monitor their systems and identify potential threats in real-time. These tools can analyze vast amounts of data and identify patterns that may indicate a potential attack, allowing companies to take action before any damage is done.
    Another key component of effective cybersecurity is employee training and awareness. Many cyber attacks are the result of human error, such as employees falling for phishing scams or using weak passwords. By educating employees about best practices for online security, companies can reduce the risk of these types of incidents and strengthen their overall cybersecurity posture.
    Ultimately, the hack of Activision serves as a reminder of the importance of cybersecurity in today's digital world. As the frequency and complexity of cyber attacks continue to grow, companies must remain vigilant and take proactive measures to protect their systems and data from potential threats.
    0 comments
    1.4k views
    Read more...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

spacer.png

Disable AdBlock
The popup will be closed in 5 seconds...